BLOGGER TEMPLATES AND TWITTER BACKGROUNDS »

30 August 2011

A Little Civil Discourse...



I guess they didn't get the Obama memo on toning down rhetoric.

My biggest concern is that, rather than wage or encourage a "war of ideas" these people - congressmen - are really encouraging a war on people.  By branding some amorphous group called "Tea Party" as "racist" and simply lying about "Tea Party's" desire to bring back Jim Crow laws and hang black congressmen from trees, they really are whipping up fear and encouraging hatred of a whole group of people.  So, whenever one of these listeners sees someone they think is "Tea Party" they're supposed to be afraid, then be angry, then do something about it.

Why not simply encourage their constituents to engage in thoughtful discussion with their neighbors?  Why not encourage them to discuss common values and to seek solutions to common problems?  Why not simply ask them to peacefully lead those misguided souls they may think are "Tea Party" to the Truth and the Light of the Progressive Solution?

I've listened to more crazy excerpts from "Tea Party" speeches than I have from progressive speeches, and I've never heard anyone say we need to hang black people from trees or that we need to reinstate Jim Crow laws or that they're happy that black people are perpetually unemployed or any other thing.  I've never heard "Tea Party" say they want poor people to starve or old people to die.  I've never heard "Tea Party" say that liberals should "go to hell".

It's a sick, sick world out there in Progressive Land.  I wish that the people trapped in that place could see the truth of what conservatives are saying.  If they then decide they don't like the ideas, that's fine.  That's what America is about.

We're not about demagoguery, though.

29 August 2011

A Double Standard in Our National Love Affair With The First Amendment...

As you undoubtedly recall, there was tremendous uproar from some people when the "Ground Zero Mosque" was proposed by a supposedly moderate cleric leading a supposedly moderate community outreach effort in New York City.

The people who opposed it (largely) did not say that no mosques should be built in America.  They did  not say that Islamic religion should not be allowed in America.  They simply said that they thought it was offensive that a mosque should be built so close to the site of a massacre carried out by Islamic terrorists in the name of Allah and Islam.  The idea was on its face repulsive, they argued.

The almost instant backlash sponsored by the popular press, the mayor of New York City, and the president of the United States branded those who opposed the mosque's location blocks from the World Trade Center as racists (as if "Muslim" is a race or ethnicity), haters, and deniers of religious freedom.

In the northern part of Phoenix, Arizona the Mormon church owns a 9 acre piece of land.  The land is in a residential area, and about half of the parcel is already occupied by a Mormon chapel.  The church wants to build a temple on the other half.

As soon as that desire was stated, groups of citizens - some neighbors, and others simply "concerned" - began legal action to block the construction of the temple.  It would be too bright, it would be too tall, it would bring too much traffic, it was not compatible with the neighboring community, it would damage home values, and on and on.

The local press (national media was not so anxious to pick up on this issue as they were the mosque) lampooned the church and sympathized with those working to stop construction.  In all the coverage, it was never implied by reporters that the real issue here was freedom of religion.  The vaunted First Amendment has never been raised.  And those who oppose this temple's construction have never been called haters or xenophobes or racists or anything but "concerned citizens".

I think it's interesting that our country still finds it acceptable to fear, despise and hate Mormons even after the (very literal) war of religious extermination (yes, "extermination" in the true sense of the word) the governments of the various states (Ohio, Missouri and Illinois specifically) - and the federal government itself (invading Utah in 1857) - waged against the Mormons in the mid-1800s.

Similar observations can be made about the way Jews are treated in our political discourse and in our media.

Neither Jewish nor Mormon leaders have ever declared a desire to destroy America.  Neither Jews nor Mormons have ever participated in any plot to harm Americans in the name of Judaism or Mormonism.  Only Islamic leaders have repeatedly called for the destruction of America (and thus the American Ideal).  And only Muslims have enlisted by the thousands and the tens of thousands in veritable armies acting out the terrible slaughter of "infidels" as Muslims call those of other faiths - Christians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists, Animists.

And yet, Islam seems to be a "sacred cow" if you will forgive the metaphor.  Why does Islam enjoy First Amendment protection in the American media and the American political system, while Christianity is systematically erased from our national discourse and ignorants within and without government are allowed to persecute Mormons and Jews?

I'm not whining about it.  I'm just wondering....

Cake. And Eat It, Too...



The problem, here, is that Mr. Obama seems to say whatever is convenient with a reckless disregard for the truth.

Either adding debt $4 trillion at a time (over 8 years, as Bush 43 did; or over 2 years, as Obama Himself did) is unpatriotic or it's not.  And if it's not, but it's necessary, does that make it okay?

Which leads to a larger philosophical question.  If something is wrong, but it seems to be unavoidable, is it right to do it?

22 August 2011

Constitutional Rights and Natural Consequences...

So, it seems that two girls who were then sophomores in high school, took advantage of the summer break in 2009 and posted lewd photos of themselves on their MySpace pages.  The principal of the school did not suspend them, but he did prohibit them from participating in school sports for one year.

The girls and their parents, aided by the ACLU, sued the school and the principal saying that the principal's action had violated the girls' civil rights under the First Amendment.

I don't agree with the assertion.  The exercise of any right or privilege is never free from consequences.

Let me try to draw an analogy.  We can try to stick with the First Amendment issue.

The supreme law of the land says that congress shall not make any law restricting the practice of religion.  Therefore, if I define my religion as one that includes - for the sake of keeping this tasteful - stealing a Snickers candy bar every Tuesday at 3pm, the law cannot keep me from practicing my religion.  However, practicing my religion will very likely yield a consequence that I cannot avoid.  I will probably be arrested  and convicted for shoplifting.  The idea that my religion holds shoplifting as one of its tenets does not change the natural consequences that will follow exercising my First Amendment right.  But has the state violated my civil rights?

Likewise, congress shall not make any law restricting the freedom of speech.  Therefore, if I choose to dress in Klan regalia and walk through Watts, California shouting racial slurs at 9 o' clock on a Friday night, there will likely be a consequence that follows exercising my right of expression.  Will my civil rights be violated, or will I simply prove Darwin's theory of natural selection?

Courts have interpreted this freedom or right to include art and symbols.  If I choose to post photos of myself smoking dope and burning an American flag while participating in a rally supporting the Communist Party of the USA, I am free under the Constitution to do that.  If a prospective employer who is a McCarthy-ite sees those photos while preparing to interview me for a job, I cannot control the consequences of my choices.  I will probably not be offered the job.  The result will not be a violation of my civil rights; it will be a natural consequence of that individual evaluating the quality of my personal judgement through the prism of his or her personal value system.

So, did this high school principal in Indiana violate the girls' civil rights in 2009?  NO!  That's a ridiculous assertion.

First of all, he did not restrict their freedom of expression.  Second of all, he did not prohibit them from coming back to his school to continue their publicly funded education.  And thirdly, he did not humiliate or demean the girls in any way - they did that all by themselves.  The principal did restrict them from participating in school sports for the year following their exhibition of poor judgement and low regard of self.  But there is no right, civil or otherwise, that any American has to participate in school sports.  If there were, schools across the country would find themselves afoul of the ACLU and the Supreme Court when they cut athletics programs in order to balance their budgets.

We have, as a people, allowed ourselves to become so "open minded" that our collective brain seems to have fallen out.






11 August 2011

Here's A Chuckle For You...

08 August 2011

My Letter To Speaker Boehner...


Mr. Boehner:

Congratulations on single-handedly leading Republicans into an ambush by "real market forces".  In addition to natural laws kicking our country's financial ---, Republicans look like the idiots who got us into this mess.  And maybe they are.

All of your political gamesmanship will not restore the wealth of our nation or the confidence of our peers in the world.

This outcome was entirely predictable and those close to you in the political process doubtless profited immensely by shorting the market prior to your "deal".

Next time, keep your hands out of the markets, open your ears and your mind to people with good ideas, and don't step on yourself like this again.  Economics is a pure, non-partisan science - avoid confusing it with statistics, propaganda or poli-sci.

May I suggest that your next course of action be: 1) Simplify the tax code - incomes of $0 - 50,000 pay 5% of gross; $50,001 - 150,000 pay 10%; and incomes above $150,000 pay 12.5%. No personal deductions.  Corporations pay 15%.  2) Cap government spending at 15% of the previous year's GDP.  3) Reduce the debt ceiling by $1 trillion per year for 10 years and limit debt in perpetuity to 33% of GDP.

Respectfully,

John N. Ellis
Prescott, Arizona

The President's Comments During Market Crash...

Today the DJIA fell more than 600 points - the 6th biggest drop in history.

In the middle of the fall, and appearing to spur the sell-off into a more frenzied pace, President Obama told the world that "in the coming weeks" he would present his own ideas for resolving the debt and deficit problems America has.

Where in the world has this idiot been for the last 6 months - let alone the last 3 years?  What in the world has this idiot been thinking about during that same period of time?  Why does this idiot need "the coming weeks" to put together his ideas?

This idiot is not a leader.  He has even lost his ability to be a community organizer (read "street agitator").  He is weak.  He is small.  He is irrelevant on the national and world stages.

And still we have craven Republican party "leaders" and shills negotiating and compromising with themselves in order to avoid the displeasure of a fraudulent administration and a complicit media complex.

Remember this in November 2012.  Throw the bums out.  Replace them with people of integrity who are committed to restoring individual liberty to American citizens.

04 August 2011

A Letter I Sent To My Representative In The House...

Dr. Gosar: 


First, let me get this out of the way. I've been contacting your office from the beginning of your term in Congress. I am not a "member" of the "Tea Party" (whatever that means); nor am I a liberal, a moderate, or an extreme "right winger" (whatever that means). When I've contacted you, you've always been very courteous and prompt with your reply. I appreciate that immensely. That is one thing I liked about your predecessor, Ms. Kirkpatrick. 


I think I'm a reasonable person - not a crank, not a conspiracy theorist, not a nut job. And I think that I think pretty well. I can see patterns and predict outcomes - especially on a macro level, such as US or World History. 


When I asked you not to support the Boehner Compromise (whatever that means) it was not because I'd been drinking the Kool-Aid at the local Tea Party. It was because EVERY SINGLE TIME our government has sought to "rescue" our economy it's turned into a financial nightmare. Have your staff look at what the DJIA did after Stimulus I, TARP, Stimulus II. Have them look at what happened after every intervention during the Great Depression. The current market free-fall was predictable. 


And I suppose I'm not the only one smart enough to have seen it. If I'd been significantly invested in the market, I could have seen this coming and made a FORTUNE by taking a short position - essentially betting against the country. 


So, I need to know what possessed you to support the plan? 


I can only imagine the pressure Speaker Boehner can bring to bear on an individual.... 


But I digress. 


Please let me know why you supported the bill. 


Respectfully, 


John N. Ellis

A Little Financial Markets History...

I know I said I'd take a week off.  I got to thinking, though.  Here's where my little mental adventure took me.

On 13 Feb 2008, President G.W. Bush signed the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008.  At the beginning of the week the Dow Jones Industrial Average opened at 12,182; by the end of that week it had risen to 12,348.  On the day the bill was signed the DJIA opened at 12,552; it closed on the following trading day at 12,377.

On 3 Oct 2008, President G.W. Bush signed the Troubled Asset Rescue Plan.  At the beginning of the week the DJIA opened at 11,140; by the end of that week it had fallen to 10,325.  On the day the bill was signed the DJIA opened at 10,484; it closed two days later at 9,447.

On 13 Feb 2009, President B.H. Obama signed the Economic Stimulus Act of 2009.  At the beginning of the week the DJIA opened at 8,281; by the end of the week it had fallen to 7,850.  On the day the bill was signed the DJIA opened at 7,933; it closed on the following trading day at 7,553.  By 9 Mar 2009 the DJIA was at 6,547.

On 23 Dec 2009, the US Senate approved the Healthcare Reform Act commonly known as "Obamacare".  At the beginning of the week the DJIA opened at 10,330; by the end of the week it had risen to 10,547.  On the day the bill was passed by the Senate the DJIA opened at 10,464; it closed on the following trading day at 10,520.

On 2 Aug 2011, the US House approved the Debt Ceiling Increase Compromise commonly known as the "Boehner Plan".  At the beginning of the week the DJIA opened at 12,144.  On the day the bill was passed the DJIA opened at 12,130; it closed on 4 Aug 2011 at 11,896.

So, what is the history lesson?  It appears that the markets do not seem to mind when the rules are changed, as in healthcare reform, as long as there are rules.  However, when there are no rules, as when Congress or the President take upon themselves to dispense cash pell-mell, the markets react poorly.  Probably because there are either no rules, or the rules are so arbitrary and are likely to be enforced capriciously that it is impossible to predict the outcome of the game.

Remember the Bush Tax Refund?  It was ridiculous, but the rules were very clear.  The Dow did not like the fact it happened, as witnessed by the "day after" number, but it bounced back quickly.

Likewise, the rules of Obamacare are written so that there is some chance of certainty.  The Dow seems to be indifferent to it.

Every other time in recent history where our government has felt compelled to "rescue" our economy it has meant disaster for the financial markets.  And that means disaster for senior citizens living on earnings from their 401k or other retirement savings.  That means disaster for investors who look with a jaundiced eye toward the very likely prospect of an insolvent Social Security Administration and who are depending on their ability to amass wealth in preparation for retirement.  It even means disaster for young people saving for college and investing 529 plans, etc.

So, what do we do?  We remind each other and our representatives of these financial facts.  We ask them to learn from history so that they do not repeat it at our expense.

03 August 2011

Turn, Turn, Turn...

To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven:  A time to be born, and a time to die; a time to plant, and a time to pluck up that which is planted;

A time to kill, and a time to heal; a time to break down, and a time to build up;

A time to weep, and a time to laugh; a time to mourn, and a time to dance;

A time to cast away stones, and a time to gather stones together; a time to embrace, and a time to refrain from embracing;

A time to get, and a time to lose; a time to keep and a time to cast away;

A time to rend, and a time to sew; a time to keep silence, and a time to speak;

 A time to love, and a time to hate; a time of war, and a time of peace.

(I swear it's not too late....)

02 August 2011

The Twenty-Third Psalm...

The Lord is my shepherd; I shall not want.  He maketh me to lie down in green pastures: he leadeth me beside the still waters.  He restoreth my soul: he leadeth me in the paths of righteousness for his name's sake.

Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil: for thou art with me; thy rod and thy staff they comfort me.  Thou preparest a table before me in the presence of mine enemies: thou anointest my head with oil; my cup runneth over.

Surely goodness and mercy shall follow me all the days of my life: and I will dwell in the house of the Lord for ever.

01 August 2011

I Lost Focus...

In all the tumult and strife about the debt ceiling and the budget I've lost focus on what's important.  I've done all I can as a person to get the outcome I desire.  It is, apparently, not to be.  And in the meantime, I've lost focus.

I've lost focus on "peace that surpasseth all understanding".

I'm going to take this week off.  Not from work, mind you!  There's precious little of that going around and I'll take it when I can get it!

I'm going to take the week off from news, the internet, email, worry.

I hope that you can do the same....

I'm going to work on making my meditation and prayer more meaningful and deliberate.  I'm going to work on walking the peaceful path more regularly.  I'm going to work on regaining perspective.

29 July 2011

Keeping Focus...

In the spirit of not getting distracted, I'd like to address my rant on John McCain's Hobbit speech.

This speech is a symptom of a pervasive problem.  We "U.S. Americans" have allowed our representatives in the federal government to go away and forget about us.  They need to be reminded regularly of their priorities; of their oath and obligation to defend the constitution and to serve their constituents in a way that will be good for all and that will preserve our nation for generations yet unborn.

Senator McCain's complete dislocation is not atypical of many in Congress, the Executive, or line bureaucrats in "public service".  Every two years we have an opportunity to remind them in a forceful way that we will not be taken advantage of and we will not allow them to sell our children's future down the river.

It is the ballot box that matters.  It is the ballot box that politicians must fear.  It is the ballot box that separates us from Egypt, Cuba, China and so many other countries in the world.  The ballot box is the only way for us to remind our representatives of their duty and to express our will on the government.

So, call your representatives.  Write to them.  Get to know them.  Remind them that you are here.  And vote your conscience.  The root is that government is unruly and without strict limits it will grow (has grown) to crush the liberty of the individual.

28 July 2011

A Little Down-Home Advice...


Never Heard of BOEMRE...?

BOEMRE is the United States Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement.

Since 2004 they have, according to the Associated Press, received more than $50,000,000 in taxpayer-provided research money - in addition to the Bureau's regular allocation of taxpayer money.

I'm curious to know how one manages, regulates or enforces the ocean's energy.

I'm also curious to know why we're paying for this, when we face imminent default on our debt.  Maybe we ought to do what "real" companies do in similar situations.  They start cutting non-essential staff and activities.

We could start with BOEMRE.  (And the Departments of Energy and Education.)

27 July 2011

Are You A Hobbit...?



The only thing that makes me madder than this completely derisive comment by Senator McCain is that I'm not surprised that this is how he feels about conservative people who will not be cowed by hyperbolic fear mongering.

If anyone needed a reason to be glad that Senator McCain is not President McCain, here it is.  The man is despicable, arrogant, self-righteous and self-absorbed.  And here he demonstrates his absolute lack of grasp on either politics, politeness, or economic realities.

What an a**.  (With all due respect to his war record, his office and his humanity...)

26 July 2011

These Are The Times That Try Men's Souls...

With national hysteria on a par with 30 October 1938, it seems that America is about to explode.

We're going to stop paying all of our bills on 3 August if Congress doesn't let the President borrow trillions of dollars more than he already has?  Come on....

Old people are going to starve or die of sicknesses?  Soldiers are going to lay down their arms in the field?  College students will stop learning and professors will stop lecturing?  (Maybe that last thing wouldn't be too bad!)

If old people starve because they can't buy food it won't be because President Obama couldn't borrow more money.  It will be because President Obama inflated the money supply so significantly and so rapidly that we have fallen into hyperinflation, where a loaf of bread costs more than a pensioner's monthly stipend.  It will be because the host of enemies from whom we've borrowed $4,000,000,000,000 in 3 years have called our loans.

It will be because of a combination of well-meaning ideas, malicious schemes, economic laws, and natural timing have come together in the perfect storm.

Now is the truly last chance America has to maintain a ghost of its former independence.  Now is the truly last chance America has to begin regaining its independence and its standing among nations.  We must take the bitter pill.  We must make the sacrifices that will lead us back from the abyss.

(Irony of ironies; recall when President Obama was asked if he believed in the idea of American exceptionalism.  His response was that he believed America was exceptional in the same way "Greeks believe Greece is exceptional."  And now we follow Greece down the path of economic apocalypse!)

I say, "Stand fast!  Do not allow an increase to the debt ceiling.  Enforce the fiscal discipline on yourselves that we have heard preached at us from the pulpit of the Presidency lo, these many months!  What is good for the goose IS good for the gander!"

23 July 2011

Disappointed...

I just have to say how absolutely disappointed I am in the Republicans we have in the US Congress.

This is, of course, speaking generally.  There have been wonderful examples of individuals hearing their constituents' voice and standing on principle.  But as a group, they've been shameful.

It seems that, before the second week of November, 2010, Republicans in Congress were back to talking and acting as if they'd been defeated.  They acted - and continue to act - as if they believed the liberal press' assertion that their victory had more to do with backward, ignorant, racist voters showing up for a one night stand than it did with a wholesale rejection of the course the country was on; perpetual war, insatiable beaurocracy, limitless government, and reckless acquisition of debt.

To have Senator McConnell and others, including Speaker Boehner in the House, act as if they have to negotiate with the President and his cabal is disgraceful.  Their answer needs to be clear.  The President can do nothing to further his agenda of American decay and debasement.  They will not allow it.  They stake their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor on defending the Constitution from all enemies - even those domestic.

Instead they act like callow shivering dogs trying desperately not to wet the floor in the foyer every time Harry Reid or Barack Obama's name is mentioned; every time they're asked a question by a reporter.  Hoping eagerly to be allowed to lick some crumb from the hand of their master.  Ears down.  Tail tucked between their legs protecting their now impotent maleness.

Where is the Lion?  Who will roar in the face of evil?  Where are the Men?  I think it's wonderful that two women have taken up the banner of liberty; Michelle Bachmann and Sarah Palin.  And I think that every political eunuch should hang his head in shame at the mention of those names until they can find the intestinal fortitude to lead.  If they lack principle, let them heed more closely the will of their constituents.  If they be principled and good, let them articulate the reason for their action, the rationale for their decision so that all can understand.

For now, I'm sorely disappointed.  I'm disgusted.

17 July 2011

Think Quick: When's Your Birthday...?



This was good for a laugh.

I'm fascinated that a man who thinks so much of himself misstates his birthday.  He made the statement on 15 July 2011.  He was born on 04 August 1961.  That's more like 3 weeks.

(Don't go thinking I'm a "Birther" or anything like that.)

Maybe he's been talking about "trillions" and "hundreds of billions" for so long that the difference between 1 and 3 is a rounding error.

I just think he's so caught up in his ideology and in executing his agenda on America and its people - especially the middle class - that he is not present.  He is actually and completely unaware of the day, the date, the place and the time.

Focused.

Just like conservatives MUST be in order to defeat the emasculation that he would continue to perpetrate on the last best hope of humanity on earth; the United States of America.

30 June 2011

Just Came To The Boiling Point...

Okay, I know I keep saying, "Don't get distracted," but this is too much for me to take.

Yesterday, Mark Halperin was asked what he thought of President Obama's press conference in which he pretended to address the budget and debt crises.  Halperin said that he thought the president "was kind of a d*** yesterday."  And...he said it on live TV.  And...he said it on MSNBC.

Halperin clearly was expressing his opinion of how the president behaved during a specific press conference.  He was not smearing the president's character.  He was not personally impugning his intelligence or morality.

The White House was outraged.  MSNBC was outraged.  Time Magazine was outraged.  Halperin was suspended "indefinitely".  Which, incidentally, means he could be back at work tomorrow morning.  Or he might not ever come back to work.

The president has the bully pulpit.  He can address the entire world at a moment's notice.  He certainly has the power to respond to disparaging remarks.  In fact, he can respond so effectively that, in many cases, he cannot sue for damages caused by slander or libel.  Because he cannot be damaged.

But the president - even The Anointed One - is only one person.  Gauge the level of outrage heard today against that heard in 2009.

What was 2009?

If you'll recall, since 2009 liberal media personalities have referred to those who adhere to Tea Party principles of individual liberty, low taxation, and restrained government as "tea baggers".  This is a particularly disgusting monicker that has reference to a fraternity hazing ritual performed, ironically, primarily at the Ivy League colleges liberals attend.

The White House, the leadership of MSNBC, even so-called Tea Party leaders, were not outraged.  In fact, it was kind of a 7th-grade joke that liberals giggled at on news shows for months.  But, hey, sticks and stones, right?

But there is no one to speak for the conservative person who has been maligned and misrepresented; insulted on the basis of intelligence and moral fiber.And liberal talking heads all over America picked up the personal insult and repeated it endlessly, smearing more than 60,000,000 American citizens who have no voice but the ballot.

And there was a collective yawn....

MSNBC's mea culpa was especially ironic, given that the "tea bagger" thing started with them, "We strive for a high level of discourse, and comments like these have no place on our air."




28 June 2011

My Thoughts on "Left" and "Right": Two Roads to The Same Place...

Now, in considering this, please do not think that I am a centrist or a moderate.  This is not the case; for the choice is not between Right and Left. 

The choice is between Liberty and Tyranny.

I stand firmly on the side of Liberty.

Liberty is not to be confused with libertarianism.  Liberty requires law, order, civil society. 

Civil society requires some allegiance to the "greater good."  Civil society requires willing sacrifice on behalf of others.

Civil society is neither Ayn Rand nor Friedrich Engles.  It is Thomas Jefferson.  It is John Adams.  It is Alexander Hamilton.  It is George Washington, and Ulyses Grant, and George Patton.  It is Confucious, and Jesus.  It is Martin Luther King, Jr., and Mohatma Ghandi.  It is environmentalism, and equality under the law.  It is free enterprise and a meritocracy. 

Civil society is the aspiration to humanity and the acknowledgement of human failings.  It does not expect perfection and it does not tolerate apathy.  Civil society is the rule of law and the mastery of self.

Marx, Lenin and You...

Karl Marx is famously misquoted as having said that "Religion is the opiate of the masses."

His actual words give us more accurate insight into his thoughts on religion.  "Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world and the soul of soulless conditions.  It is the opium of the people."

In Marx's opinion, people developed religious faith because the human condition drove them to it.  Absent oppression, religion would be obsolete.

Vladimir Lenin said similarly, yet almost admiringly, "[The masses] are taught by religion to practise charity while on earth, thus offering them a very cheap way of justifying [the capitalists'] entire existence as exploiters and selling them at a moderate price tickets to well-being in heaven."

Lenin recognized that if "the masses" could have their senses dulled by "spiritual vodka" as he called it, they could be cajoled into doing anything, or abused at the will of the masters.

Religion was then a powerful tool to be used wisely by the masters.  And, as Lenin and his cabal became the masters of Russia, they used the false religion of the State to stupify their subjects.

In America, though, we love to boast of our "freedom" and our "liberty". 

My father-in-law grew up during the Second World War and the 1950s.  One evening as we talked of politics he looked at me and said, "You think you live in a free country.  If you could see the America I grew up in you wouldn't even recognize it!" 

His implication was that the culture and condition of "Americans" had evolved so radically that the "freedom" we thought we enjoyed in the 1990s was a shadow of the virtually unfettered liberties of the early Post-War years. 

The prosperity of America following World War II and through the 1990s allowed for leisure time.  More leisure time than mankind had enjoyed in history.

And entertainment became the new American Religion.  Focus shifted from interdependence to independence.  Independence deteriorated in the 1960s and 1970s to dependence - dependence on drugs, on illicit sex; on entertainment. 

The goal of the behaviors driven by dependence is, ironically, to distract oneself from one's dependent and pathetic condition.

As the "opiate" of entertainment stupefied Americans, a few who were alert took advantage of their compatriots' condition.  They rose to positions of power and authority in education, industry and government.  Some of them called themselves "conservatives" or "Republicans" and others called themselves "liberals" or "Democrats"; some called themselves "pure capitalists" and others called themselves "corporate citizens".  They pretended to aim at widely divergent goals.  Some cried for individual liberty, and others called for compassion for the less fortunate among us; some talked of shareholder interests, and others preached social responsibility.

In truth, their drive was shared.  They were all motivated by greed and the will to amass personal power; to gain control and keep control. 

Today we are so restricted in our individual liberties - and so well accustomed to those restrictions - that we think little of the fact that the Indiana State Supreme Court recently ruled that police officers do not need a warrant to enter homes in the state - regardless of probable cause or iminent danger (or the lack thereof).

We think nothing of US Senators serving 6, 7 or even 8 6-year terms in a row. 

We collectively lack the intelligence to question any idea presented as "fact" by an "authority".  The slogan so popular among Baby Boomers, "Question Authority!" now draws stern reproach from those "Boomers" because it now threatens their own standing in society.  It threatens to expose their own hypocrisy and deception they are now perpetrating on America.

So, I say, "WAKE UP, AMERICA!"  Kick the entertainment habit. 

While you are distracted and dulled you have lost your country!  If we do not do something NOW, we risk having lost the ideal of "America" forever.

23 June 2011

Karmic, Cosmic and Metaphysical...

A while back someone in a position to really hurt me and my family did just that. 

In the moment I tried to have - and succeeded in having - a dignified and restrained response.  Following my family back to England in the mid-1800s, it's that stiff upper lip, and all.

It was also the WWJD thing that we learn from childhood in Sunday School.

Anyway, I did keep the outward appearance and behavior of calm professionalism. 

Inside and at times when I was alone I ran the gammut of emotion. 

I was euphoric because I was out of a situation that was uncomfortable, unproductive, unrewarding and stressful.  I was resentful because I felt misunderstood. 

I was peaceful because I knew that, contrary to the old addage, God's hand is in the details of our lives.  I was anxious because now one of my prime responsibilities would be much more difficult to fulfill. 

I was excited because a whole world of opportunity and options lay open before me.  I was frustrated because there were no opportunities open to me. 

I was compassionate to the person who had done this and their associates.  I was filled with rage and hatred for that person and everyone who surrounded them.

And over time, I felt that my inner feelings were getting more in line with what my will would have them be.  You see, I want to be a person who is magnanamous, charitable, kind and unflappable in every situation.  I admire Sir Thomas Moore's response when he learned that his friend's inattention had led to the destruction of his manuscript for the history he'd been working on for 2 years or more.

I want to be that guy.

Today, as I sat working on my new "opportunities" I started to think about some of the details around the event in question.  I started to see how some of the things had not been right. 

I don't discount any part I may have played in the troubles.  I'm sure, because I've examined it, that I could have done more and done differently. 

But the real insensitivity and the real injustice and the way I perceived that they were dragging out the agreed upon act of doing right by me started to eat at me this afternoon.

And I could feel the very real event of positive, creative, generative energy leaving my body and it was replaced with a dark energy.  An energy that brought with it lethargy, anger, a hyperactive sense of "justice", and malice began to fill me.

I knew I needed to change my place - both spiritually and physically.  So, I went out to a lake near the house.  I sat in the shade and focused on the nature that surrounded me.  I listened to the wind and watched the birds.  I searched my heart and I talked with God. 

And in the process I felt changed. 

I'm not describing some rebirth or powerful cleansing.  It was a subtle change.  The edge came off my anger.  Some cloud obscured my certain view into the intent of the soul of another.  And just as clouds pass and blades are sharpened I knew that this change was fleeting.

I knew it was a change I needed to keep, though.  And I understand it's a change I need to repeat continually until, at last, Grace has place in my heart and drives out bitterness and despair forever.

14 June 2011

Where Has He Been...?

President Obama just warned us that, if the debt ceiling is not raised, the country could be in line for a financial crisis....

Where has this guy BEEN since his election!?

Follow this link to the Reuters news story.

07 June 2011

The Mormon Exodus...

This past week I had a chance to participate as an adult leader in a brief and highly modified reenactment of the Mormon handcart pioneer trek.

For those of you with teenage children who may participate in such a trek, I will warn you here that I may spoil some of the surprising aspects of the experience, so allow them to read this at your discretion.

The Mormon Exodus is a mass migration of epic proportions, and one largely ignored by history in America.

It involved thousands on thousands of men, women and children from around the globe.  Initially, the Exodus began in flight.  Comprised primarily of Mormons, or members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, entire communities became ghost towns as local, state and federal governments refused to provide protection to the Saints against mobs of militia, ruffians, and neighbors.

Persecution was intense.  The first "Gathering" of the Mormons was to Kirtland, Ohio.  There, a small country crossroads became the headquarters of the newly formed church and the Saints began building a temple in anticipation of the restoration of the rites enjoyed in ancient Israel.  Local opposition resulted in the Church establishing a secondary center on the fringes of the United States, in Jackson County, Missouri.

Hatred for the new church and its members was even more intense in Missouri.  The governor of the state issued what became known as the "Extermination Order" which stayed in force until 1976.  This order declared Mormons enemies of the state and authorized the militia and any citizen to drive the Mormons from the state or to kill them in the effort.

Mobs fought battles with Mormons at Crooked River, Missouri and Haun's Mill, Missouri among other places.  The result of these battles was that the Saints were forced to leave their homes in Jackson County and were relocated to Caldwell and Clay counties and then, in the deep of winter, were forced to leave the state of Missouri altogether.

They crossed east into Illinois where residents were initially kind.  From Quincy, Illinois they moved north to settle in a disease-infested swamp called Commerce.  The Saints drained the swamp, established a settlement, and again began construction on a temple.  They intended to stay in what they renamed "Nauvoo" for a long time.

As Nauvoo grew to be the largest town in Illinois, concern about the political power of a Mormon voting block grew also.  Persecution followed.  Outlying farms were vandalized and their occupants were terrorized. In 1844, seeking to put an end to a religion that they viewed mistakenly as a cult of personality, a mob with the tacit approval of the governor of Illinois murdered Joseph Smith the church's founder, and his brother Hyrum the church patriarch.

Contrary to expectations, this murder was seen as "martyr" and the Church continued to grow.

Mob pressure was relieved somewhat, but state pressure on the Mormons to leave Illinois grew until, in 1846, the leaders of the Mormon church were notified that the state could no longer ensure the safety of the Mormons.  They were told that they would need to leave the state that year.

In the winter of 1846 thousands of members of the Church packed their belongings into wagons pulled by ox or horse teams and moved across the frozen Mississippi River into Iowa.  In the muddy spring those same Saints pulled 300 miles across Iowa and across the Missouri River into Nebraska (Indian) Territory to establish Winter Quarters near what is now Florence, Nebraska.

In spring of the next year Brigham Young led an expeditionary party more than 1,200 miles across the Rocky Mountains and into Mexico's valley of the Great Salt Lake.  Here, beyond the reach of the United States government, the Mormons hoped to live in peace.

By 1849 the pace of emigration had become deliberate.  Wagon trains were organized and supplies were laid in.

In the following 20 years, until the railroad extended to Utah in 1869, more than 60,000 converts to Mormonism would leave their homes and make the trek of thousands of miles to "gather with the Saints" in the Intermountain West.

By the mid-1850s the cost of wagon travel had grown and emigrating Saints needed a less expensive means of travel.  Brigham Young and other Church leaders conceived what they termed "the handcart plan".  Rather than loading all their possessions into heavy wagons and using draft animals to pull them slowly across the plains, new emigrants would be allowed no more than 17 lbs. of luggage and would pull relatively light handcarts across the well-traveled road into the Great Salt Lake Valley.  It was estimated that the Saints could pull 15 to 20 miles each day and move faster than the plodding oxen.  Whatever they needed for living would be available to them when they reached the Valley.

Further, the handcart pioneers would not carry with them all the food they would need on the trail.  Resupply wagons would be sent from Salt Lake City to meet them a little more than halfway between Winter Quarters and Salt Lake.

Of the 10-or-so handcart companies, only 2 ran into any significant trouble.  It is the immense sacrifice and the tremendous dedication of these pioneers that the handcart trek reenactments seek to memorialize.

In our recent reenactment a mob (historically out of context, as handcart pioneers faced no such persecution) came to drive us out of our camp one night.  They threw our gear around, took our food, and generally terrorized the group until we were forced to move.

As I looked into the faces of these mobbers, I recognized many of them.  Some were even my friends, parents of friends, and young people I knew.  I called them by name and tried to reason with them, but my efforts to calm them were unheeded.

And it struck me there, that this was just how it was for the early Saints who did experience mobbings.  Their neighbors, people with whom they traded, people they thought of as friends, were among the paint-faced cowards now trampling their gardens and burning their barns.  They would have seen the faces of prominent members of the community and clergy of other churches as they were dragged from their homes to be beaten, tarred, and feathered.  And they would have called to them, just as I did.  Tried to reason with them, just as I did.  And failed, just as I did.

That was a powerful realization for me.  As a child I was bullied incessantly from 4th grade until I started high school.  To recognize my tormentors was too familiar to me.  Primal feelings came to the surface during that experience as I recognized the mobbers.  The instinct to fight, the ability to do so, and rage met in a perfect storm that I could barely control.  (The "mobbers" later referred to me as that "mean Mormon".)

The rest of the experience was, I imagine, just as hundreds of other pioneers experienced it.  Long days of hot and dusty walking.  And thinking.  And wondering about what lay ahead....