My gay friends have consistently, stridently and repeatedly argued that their push for what they call 'marriage equality' is not an attack on the traditional family.
This article exposes the lie that they've either been ignorant or party to.
Not An Assault On The Family...?!
How can any sentient being have been, or allow themselves to be deceived by this notion? All one must do is find the origins of the 'gay marriage' movement. They don't trace back to homosexuals. Indeed, in the 1980s around San Francisco, where I grew up the message was loud and clear: We choose the gay lifestyle because it's the anti-family. We have no responsibilities, no children, no strings and no rules.
But then something changed in America. We tilted to the left and became a much more government-focused people. And then something changed in the 'gay agenda.' The 'gay agenda' was co-opted by the 'progressive agenda.' Just like the 'civil rights' movement has been hijacked by progressives, so has the gay movement.
Marx, in his Communist Manifesto cheerfully cries for "abolition of the family!" His argument goes something like this: Since only the bourgeois (middle class) have intact families, and the proletariat (worker) is reduced to seeking fulfillment in broken families and prostitutes, the natural solution is to destroy the bourgeois family. (Don't speak of building up the family as an institution among workers!)
Now, we have arguably the most Marxist president and administration arguing before the arguably most Progressive Supreme Court that children do not have a natural or fundamental human right to have a mother. Just as Marx, they posit that, because some children do not have mothers living with them at home, no children should.
(Why not speak the truth: Having a father and a mother in every home is the ideal. The simple and sad fact that it is not so for all children does not make the ideal void.)
This article exposes the lie that they've either been ignorant or party to.
Not An Assault On The Family...?!
How can any sentient being have been, or allow themselves to be deceived by this notion? All one must do is find the origins of the 'gay marriage' movement. They don't trace back to homosexuals. Indeed, in the 1980s around San Francisco, where I grew up the message was loud and clear: We choose the gay lifestyle because it's the anti-family. We have no responsibilities, no children, no strings and no rules.
But then something changed in America. We tilted to the left and became a much more government-focused people. And then something changed in the 'gay agenda.' The 'gay agenda' was co-opted by the 'progressive agenda.' Just like the 'civil rights' movement has been hijacked by progressives, so has the gay movement.
Marx, in his Communist Manifesto cheerfully cries for "abolition of the family!" His argument goes something like this: Since only the bourgeois (middle class) have intact families, and the proletariat (worker) is reduced to seeking fulfillment in broken families and prostitutes, the natural solution is to destroy the bourgeois family. (Don't speak of building up the family as an institution among workers!)
Now, we have arguably the most Marxist president and administration arguing before the arguably most Progressive Supreme Court that children do not have a natural or fundamental human right to have a mother. Just as Marx, they posit that, because some children do not have mothers living with them at home, no children should.
(Why not speak the truth: Having a father and a mother in every home is the ideal. The simple and sad fact that it is not so for all children does not make the ideal void.)
Posts
0 comments:
Post a Comment